If Kyle Walker Wants Out, Spurs Aren’t In A Position To Stop Him


‘Kyle Walker, we want you to stay’ was a muted chant heard throughout pockets of fans at White Hart Lane’s final outing last Sunday. On the touchline as he warmed up from the substitute’s bench, he did not passionately belt but tapped the crest and looked up in awe at the fans. It felt a little like a farewell.

If that were to be Harry Kane, the whole ground would be chanting in unison. Kane, for instance, symbolises something much larger than his obvious quality and if Tottenham were to lose him, they would be losing a smidgeon of their heart. As Daniel Levy pronounced on Sunday, he and everybody else currently occupying the jobs at Tottenham are mere ‘custodians’ of the club, but Kane, Pochettino, even Levy himself, represent this era. Walker, on the other hand, is just another cog in the machine. As blunt as it may sound, the right back is important, but he’s not imperative to Tottenham’s progress. That responsibility lies at the feet of Harry Kane, Harry Winks and even Dele Alli, who is showing increasing signs of loyalty to Tottenham’s vision. Walker, who has had to endure some miserable times at club, seems less connected. He’s professional, but has never wavered from his loyalty to Sheffield United and northern England.

Things have turned a little nasty over past weeks. Walker the indispensable and most talented right back in the Premier League is now being termed greedy and a troublemaker in Tottenham’s happy camp. Rumours, and they remain rumours, that the ex-Sheffield United man has gotten on the wrong side of Pochettino has meant that fans, who will always side with their beloved coach, have temporarily turned on Walker. Nabil Bentaleb and Andros Townsend suffered similar fates. Fuelled by frustration, annoyance and paranoia, the relationship feels like a teenage one. Once he took to Twitter and Instagram to post his own, personalised tribute to White Hart Lane, fans switched back to loving, pleading their man to stay. If he were to leave, and if it were to be on healthy terms, he would be looked back upon fondly.

But with Pochettino placing so much importance on dependence and devotion and with Levy continually thinking with the club’s finances in mind, Kyle Walker’s exit seems inevitable. His performances have declined, not dramatically, but sufficiently to warrant accusations that perhaps his head is in the wrong place. The timing of that is obscure, particularly as Spurs were beginning to mount a genuine title challenge, but needs must. Spurs shouldn’t be the club to block players leaving. They, and specifically Pochettino, need players and staff that they can trust to get them through the next year at Wembley and neatly transition into the new stadium.

Spare a thought for Kieran Trippier. Bought originally to quicken Walker’s progress, Trippier has played second fiddle. His form and professional not only during Walker’s absence but throughout his Spurs career has been exemplary and there has been no real reason for him to be dropped. If anything, he is the current first choice. Harry Kane is always quick to speak out and cry that Tottenham is the place to be at the moment, but if any players needs to seek pastures new, they should be permitted that opportunity.

Walker has been the best right back in the Premier League over two seasons. His progression is testament to himself and Mauricio Pochettino. Once known for his fatal errors and clumsiness, he is now defensively stable, a creator of goals and a perfect fit for Tottenham’s 3-4-2-1. He has been a truly fantastic player for the club. Tottenham would rather keep him as a product of Pochettino, a player fully integrated into the Spurs way of thinking, but that does not make him irreplaceable. There have been murmurs of Dani Alves, but the crux of this Spurs side are lower profile signings educated Pochettino’s way. There will always be a replacement.

Delving into transfer speculation is, in itself, speculative, but transfers carry a heavier load this summer for Tottenham. When it is becoming increasingly important to keep the club as one, it is greeted with great fear and obsession once a player is linked with a switch, especially if it is to a side who don’t immediately seem like an upward step e.g. to Manchester City as is the case with Kyle Walker. While Tottenham are currently a very unique and exciting ‘project’, a move to Manchester City represents an opportunity for stability, and in truth, silverware. Guardiola could have his own, intriguing ideas for England’s right back.

I fear Tottenham will be plagued by this type of story until they really achieve. Had they been playing in an FA Cup Final or had they pushed Chelsea to the final day, the Walker stories were inevitable. While performances on the pitch and the progressions off it are headed into unknown territory, they’ll maintain their reputation amongst the elite clubs as a pocket to pick from. Until they really reach a peak, they’re in no position to hold players against their will.

Hampshire-based freelance sports writer who has written features for a variety of sports platforms/news outlets while maintaining a blog with the Huffington Post UK.

Share this:




8 Comments on “If Kyle Walker Wants Out, Spurs Aren’t In A Position To Stop Him”

  1. ozark says:

    A club doesn’t keep a player, contract or not, who is not invested in the club, either by salary and/or the potential to win silverware. Walker is one injury away from being first choice again and in the 2017/18 season they have games twice a week. Poch did a masterful job of switching out the fullbacks until they were dumped out of the European games and then he switched to the best players available every week. Nothing is changing this season. Spurs also have young players on the radar or coming through – Sessegnon from Fulham and Walker-Peters. I would say buy Sessegnon and sell Kyle Walker. Its good business.

  2. Chas says:

    Stuart Fagg just made a complete goose of himself in writing this piece of contrived rubbish.

  3. Mohammed says:

    It’s normal to abandon a sinking ship but spurs is rock solid and steady breaking waves. Nobody should be able to allowed to disturb that solidity. Poch and Levy are into a long journey. The media do not sell our players. Work hard silver ware will follow.

  4. matt says:

    Spurs are under no contractual obligation to allow Kyle Walker to leave and can technically refuse any offers for his services until the club’s valuation of him is met. He is under contract until 2021, which puts Spurs in a strong position both with the player himself and with any potential suitors.

    From a practical standpoint, if the relationship between Poch and Walker has deteriorated to a point where it is in the best interest of the club to sell him, then Levy will likely attempt to ‘auction’ Walker off to the highest bidder and thus extract the highest price possible from any prospective buyer, like Man City.

    Walker is professional and he is not a troublemaker, unlike Adebayor, so I don’t envisage that he is going to refuse to play for Spurs, whilst he is under contract. Therefore, contrary to the supposition in the article, it is the club who has the upper hand in this situation, rather than Walker himself.

  5. Groomy says:

    Sometime very soon everyone is going to realise that what is going on at Tottenham is not a fluke – we are not one season or two season wonders – we are the best run club in EPL we play the best football there is no sense in jumping ship to win silverware at City – the Levy project is working and he is doing it right

  6. S-P says:

    Technically they are. He is on a long contract.

    Conversely, Pochettino doesn’t want anyone in the squad who hasn’t bought into his ethos, methodology and vision. So any disruptive element, which a player being forced to stay at the club against his will would be, would not really be welcome for group cohesion, not because that player didn’t like being made to stay. The length of his contract, Sours could pretty much end his career – that’s actually quite a strong leg to stand on. But why bother when Poch would want rid because he would cease to be a player who holds any positive attributes to him,band being at his peak and on a long contract Levy can screw a massive fee.

    Don’t mistake the two: Spurs really could dig the heel in, just wouldn’t want to.

  7. Andrew says:

    Erm…..he signed a contract in September 2016 to 2021…so the club can keep rejecting offers until 2020 at the latest. No one is going to leave unless a club meets Spurs’ valuation of the player. Which is the same for any player, at any club. Only when a player is down to the last year of their contract and is refusing to sign a new one, are a club forced to sell a player against their wishes. So Walker isn’t going anywhere unless someone pays what the club wants. Same as any player. I’m sure they’d sell Kane if someone offered £200m – the same with Messi at Barcelona. As such, this article is a non-story. The reason the media write so many stories about Spurs players leaving, is because they have so many good young players that other teams covet. The media are hardly going to write about clubs after United or Arsenal players, are they?

  8. Niven Frey says:

    A ridiculous article backed with no evidence. Walker has a long contract only having just signed one. If you don’t think contracts are relevant – look what happened to Berahinho. If Spurs sell Walker it will be on their terms and because they want to. They have a stadium to fill, sponsorship deals to do, naming rights etc. This becomes much more difficult if you are seen as a selling club. Think about it! Spurs currently remind me of the rise of Hitler. That they are rising is there for all to see and yet all seem in denial.

Leave a Reply